2/12 Nominees: Boone, Nixon, Howard, Manny
Brett Boone - A second-baseman who early in his career was jacking 15 homers a year, his power numbers exploded at the same time he became bulked up. The numbers started climbing – not surprisingly – in 1998, and in 2001 and 2003 he cranked 37 and 35 homers respectively. Perhaps coincidentally, testing started naming names in 2004, and he was suddenly out of baseball in 2005. Perhaps not coincidentally.
Trot Nixon – This one pains me, because I am a huge fan of Nixon. But if you were to draw-up a middle-of-the-road player who would be a candidate for performance enhancing drugs, Nixon would be the poster boy. Drafted in 1993 as a likely future superstar, Nixon never lived up to the hype, and by 1999 he was an underachieving prospect struggling for a fulltime roster spot. That’s a lot of temptation. His numbers jumped in 2001 through 2003, and then he fell off.
Ryan Howard - Howard was one of the players nominated by reader Junior13 yesterday. And the success of players like Howard add an interesting wrinkle to the arguement, which is: How do we know who is currently using things like Human Growth Hormone that are undetectable? We don’t know, and all we are left with is speculation — which may be justified given the cloud of suspicion over baseball. Howard didn’t come into baseball until testing was already up and running. He’s put up huge home run numbers since coming into baseball, but a lot of that could be due to the small ballpark he plays in, or even just natural power. It’s not clear if he is on something, but that kind of power can’t help but make you wonder. It’s certainly open to debate.
Manny Ramirez - Another nominee courtesy of Junior13, Manny has been an offensive monster since his first full season in the bigs in 1995. His numbers have been consistent throughout his career. What goes against him is his career spans the Steroid Era. Considering the time he is playing in, the numbers he puts up and how hard it works at hitting, it wouldn’t be a big leap to assume Manny used at this time. However, what works in Manny’s favor is his consistency; there has never really been any spike in his numbers. And a lot of suspected PED users saw a spike in their numbers somewhere between the time of 1998-2003. The debate is certainly open on Manny, and I was ready to condemn him, but considering his consistency and the lack of a spike, I tend to lean toward ‘no’ on this one.
Recent Comments